By
Stephen Z. Nemo:
As President Obama’s policies move America closer to
resembling Euro nanny states with chronic unemployment, meager economic growth,
greater government dependency, many American conservatives and Tea Partiers
wonder why the Republican Party, to whom they gave the House majority, is so willing
to alienate their supporters in order to help Democrats maintain the
authoritarian status quo ante.
Chalk it up to America’s two-party political cartel.
Peter Mair, along with colleague Richard Katz, came
up with “Cartel Party Theory” in the 1990s. In an article that appeared in a
British political science journal, Mair wrote that Britain’s “age of party
democracy has passed. Although the parties themselves remain, they have become
so disconnected from the wider society, and pursue a form of competition that
is so lacking in meaning, that they no longer seem capable of sustaining
democracy in its present form.”
Does that sound familiar?
I’ve often argued with my conservative friends that what
separates the era of George W. Bush from that of Barack Obama is the scope of
their big-government schemes: Bush pushed for and got a $17 billion bailout for
Detroit’s automakers. Obama gave Motor City an $80 billion bailout; Bush dealt
with the financial crisis of 2008 by asking Congress to pass a $152 billion
economic “stimulus” package. Obama got nearly $1 trillion; Bush signed
legislation that represented the most significant overhaul of Medicare in its
38-year history, creating a drug prescription program that has cost taxpayers
more than a half trillion dollars to date. The expansion of Medicare under Obama’s
health care monstrosity will increase Medicare and Medicaid spending by $75
billion to $100 billion annually, according to the Congressional Budget Office;
Bush signed the Patriot Act into law, which allowed secret courts to rubber
stamp government spying operations on Americans. Obama expanded it under his
“Prism” program; Bush nominated Ben Bernanke to head the Federal Reserve, whose
easy money policies created a housing bubble and toxic subprime loans. Obama
reinstated Bernanke, whose quantitative easing has increased prices at the gas
pump and supermarket, creating a stock market bubble for the bursting.
Obama, it seems, is Bush on steroids.
The recent battle between Tea Party and conservative
Congressmen with the GOP leadership over defunding ObamaCare underscores the cozy
relationship that exists between Washington’s big-government Republican and Democrat
cartel members.
According to Veronique de Rugy of the Mercatus Center of George Mason University, the recent budget agreement reached between GOP House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and Democratic Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murry increases government spending – with miniscule cuts slated to take place sometime in the distant future … if ever.
What concerns de Rugy is that the unfunded liabilities
of federal spending were not addressed: “Although these future [unfunded
entitlement] commitments are not scored by the Congressional Budget Office…
economists and lawmakers of all stripes are coming to recognize the need for
some honest accounting of it,” wrote de Rugy in US News and World Report. “A recent paper by Boston University
economist Laurence Kotlikoff for the Mercatus Center argues it adds up to $205
trillion over an infinite time horizon. Other estimates of the fiscal gap range
from $54.4 trillion to $86.8 trillion.”
“Many in the GOP establishment, and in particular
the donor community, want him [Ryan] to think bigger and make a bid either for
president or House leadership,” The Hill
reported. Big money truly loves Washington’s bipartisan power cartel.
Democrat Murry and Republican Ryan are
interchangeable Pez dispensers. They redistribute your income as though it were
candy.
CNN
reported that investment giant Goldman Sachs contributed $994,798 to Obama’s
2008 presidential campaign. In 2012, Goldman Sachs contributed $1,033,204 to
Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, according to OpenSecrets.org.
Last February, the New York Times reported Karl Rove’s super PAC, American Crossroads,
would back efforts to “put a new twist on the Republican-vs.-Republican warfare
that has consumed the party’s primary races in recent years. In effect, the
establishment is taking steps to fight back against Tea Party groups and other
conservative organizations that have wielded significant influence in backing
candidates who ultimately lost seats to Democrats in the general election.”
That’s an odd observation considering the Tea Party
gave Republicans a major victory in the 2010 midterm elections. Establishment
Republicans, on the other hand, saddled their moribund party with consecutive
establishment losers in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections… and will most
likely repeat the trend by nominating blue-state Republican gasbag Chris
Christie in 2016.
It angers Republican Party loyalists when I point
out, in the words of the late Gov. George Wallace, “There’s not a dime’s worth
of difference between the Republicans and Democrats.” For them, American
politics is a team sport. It doesn’t matter what the team stands for, only that
they move the ball down the field. Problems arise, however, when the team in
question continually runs the ball in the direction of the so-called opposition’s
goal post.
I have a different take: Republican and Democratic cartel
politicians are on the same team. “We the People” are the opposing team that
refuses to suit up and take the field.
Frankly my dears, I don’t give a damn if Karl Rove’s
GOP wins control of Congress in 2014. My main concern is that Tea Party
candidates continue challenging the GOP’s cartel politicians in the Republican primaries
and beyond.
Whether it’s OPEC or Mexico’s deadly Los Zetas gang,
cartels are criminal organizations whose prime interest is to shake down the innocent
and secure its monopoly on power by whatever means necessary.
Establishment Republicans would have you believe the
contest of the 2014 midterm elections is to take control of the US Senate. In
reality, it’s the GOP’s establishment cartel politicians, their deep-pocket donors,
against their Tea Party and conservative challengers.
2014 may be the year bipartisan cartel politicians break
the backs of outside threats to their authoritarian power. If so, it won’t be
their money that wins the day. It will be the Tea Party’s lack of focus and organization.
No comments:
Post a Comment